[PATCH] In psql \?, add [+] annotation where appropriate

Matthijs van der Vleuten <postgresql@zr40.nl>

From: "Matthijs van der Vleuten" <postgresql@zr40.nl>

To: pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org

Date: 2021-03-21T19:41:47Z

Lists: pgsql-hackers

Commits

Same data as JSON: GET /api/v1/messages/:b64id/commits the thread's linked commits as JSON, with link sources. API reference →

Fix inconsistencies in psql --help=commands
- 954ee4b566ee 9.6.23 landed
- 16a7ed765d6f 10.18 landed
- f0f879e106d5 11.13 landed
- 01e9e935a1df 12.8 landed
- 6bfcc7d0d19a 13.4 landed
- 845cad4d51cb 14.0 landed

Attachments

0001-In-psql-add-annotation.patch (text/x-patch) patch 0001

Hi,

User inoas on IRC channel #postgresql noted that \? does not describe \do as supporting the + option. It does however support this option, as do \dAp and \dy.

This patch adds the annotation to the description of these commands in \?.

While adding it to the translation files I noticed some obvious errors, so this patch fixes the following as well:

* correct inconsistent alignment. This was especially egregious in fr.po. Differing alignment across sections in es.po is preserved as this may have been a deliberate choice by the translator.
* cs.po: remove extraneous newline
* es.po: replace incorrect mention of \do with the correct \dAc, \dAf and \dAo
* fr.po: merge some small lines that still fit within 78 chars
* fr.po: remove [brackets] denoting optional parameters, when these aren't present in the English text
* fr.po: \sv was shown as accepting "FONCTION". This is replaced with "VUE".
* fr.po: \t was missing its optional [on|off] parameter.
* tr.po: fix typo at \d
* uk.po: add missing newline at \c

Regards,
Matthijs