Re: Let's make PostgreSQL multi-threaded
Joe Conway <mail@joeconway.com>
From: Joe Conway <mail@joeconway.com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>, Thomas Munro <thomas.munro@gmail.com>
Cc: Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>, Heikki Linnakangas
<hlinnaka@iki.fi>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Date: 2023-06-07T12:46:51Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On 6/6/23 22:02, Tom Lane wrote: > (and, I predict, more than one security-grade bug). *That* is what worries me the most > I agree that if we were building this system from scratch today, > we'd probably choose thread-per-session not process-per-session. > But the costs of getting to that from where we are will be enormous. > I seriously doubt that the net benefits could justify that work, > no matter how long you want to look forward. It's not really > significantly different from "let's rewrite the server in > C++/Rust/$latest_hotness". Agreed. -- Joe Conway PostgreSQL Contributors Team RDS Open Source Databases Amazon Web Services: https://aws.amazon.com