Re: [WIP PATCH] for Performance Improvement in Buffer Management
Amit Kapila <amit.kapila@huawei.com>
From: Amit kapila <amit.kapila@huawei.com>
To: Jeff Janes <jeff.janes@gmail.com>
Cc: "pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org" <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Date: 2012-11-20T13:49:12Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Attachments
- Results.htm (text/html)
On Monday, November 19, 2012 8:52 PM Amit kapila wrote: On Monday, November 19, 2012 5:53 AM Jeff Janes wrote: On Sun, Oct 21, 2012 at 12:59 AM, Amit kapila <amit.kapila@huawei.com> wrote: > On Saturday, October 20, 2012 11:03 PM Jeff Janes wrote: > >>Run the modes in reciprocating order? >>> Sorry, I didn't understood this, What do you mean by modes in reciprocating order? >> By reciprocating, I mean to run them in the reverse order, or in random order. > Today for some configurations, I have ran by reciprocating the order. The detailed data for all other various configuration is attached with this mail. > The 2 problems which are observed in V-Tune Profiler Reports for Buffer Management are: > a. Partition Lock > b. Buf-Free List Lock > Tommorow, I will send you some of the profiler reports for different scenario where the above is observed. Still not able to prepare reoprt. Shall try tommorow. With Regards, Amit Kapila.