Re: PGXS: REGRESS_OPTS=--load-language=plpgsql

David E. Wheeler <david@kineticode.com>

From: "David E. Wheeler" <david@kineticode.com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Cc: Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>, Dimitri Fontaine <dfontaine@hi-media.com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>, Takahiro Itagaki <itagaki.takahiro@oss.ntt.co.jp>, David Fetter <david@fetter.org>, Euler Taveira de Oliveira <euler@timbira.com>, PG Hackers <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Date: 2010-02-20T18:40:34Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On Feb 20, 2010, at 9:49 AM, Tom Lane wrote:

>> This discussion is sounding very design-ish, which makes me think we
>> should just leave things unchanged for 9.0 and have external regression
>> test designers work around this problem in their Makefiles, as Alvaro
>> suggested.
> 
> I would have said that some time ago, except that I think we have a
> "must fix" issue here: isn't pg_upgrade broken for any database
> containing plpgsql?  A decent solution for that probably will allow
> something to fall out for the regression test problem too.

There is also the "must fix" issue with pg_regress.

Thanks,

David