Thread
-
Source directory
Magnus Hagander <mha@sollentuna.net> — 2006-12-04T13:39:36Z
What's the rationale behind naming the 8.2.0 version directory 8.2? Given that the files in it are named 8.2.0? It breaks a whole set of scripts for me :-( FOr example the ones used to load the docs on the website (which is why I noticed it - most others I don't use on .0 versions). I know we've done similar things in the past, but I fail to understand *why*... ;-) //Magnus
-
Re: Source directory
Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net> — 2006-12-05T22:42:37Z
Magnus Hagander wrote: > What's the rationale behind naming the 8.2.0 version directory 8.2? > Given that the files in it are named 8.2.0? It's a mistake that was pointed out days ago but still not corrected. Someone please rename the thing. -- Peter Eisentraut http://developer.postgresql.org/~petere/
-
Re: Source directory
Dave Page <dpage@postgresql.org> — 2006-12-05T22:47:34Z
Peter Eisentraut wrote: > Magnus Hagander wrote: >> What's the rationale behind naming the 8.2.0 version directory 8.2? >> Given that the files in it are named 8.2.0? > > It's a mistake that was pointed out days ago but still not corrected. > Someone please rename the thing. No, don't - otherwise the download links and mirrors are will be out of sync for a day or so preventing people downloading easily. Add a symlink, then rename in a couple of days should be safe though. Regards, Dave