Re: timeout implementation issues

Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>

From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
To: Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>
Cc: Thomas Lockhart <lockhart@fourpalms.org>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>, Michael Loftis <mloftis@wgops.com>, PostgreSQL Development <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Date: 2002-04-18T05:31:41Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us> writes:
> I have added this to the TODO list, with a question mark.  Hope this is
> OK with everyone.

>         o Abort SET changes made in aborted transactions (?)

Actually, I was planning to make only search_path act that way, because
of all the push-back I'd gotten on applying it to other SET variables.
search_path really *has* to have it, but if there's anyone who agrees
with me about doing it for all SET vars, they didn't speak up :-(

			regards, tom lane