Re: Remove vacuum_defer_cleanup_age
Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com>
From: Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
Cc: "pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org" <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Date: 2016-10-18T20:18:07Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On 10/12/2016 05:00 PM, Robert Haas wrote: > On Sun, Oct 9, 2016 at 9:51 PM, Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com> wrote: >> Given that hot_standby_feedback is pretty bulletproof now, and a lot of >> the work in reducing replay conflicts, I think the utility of >> vacuum_defer_cleanup_age is at an end. I really meant so submit a patch >> to remove it to 9.6, but it got away from me. >> >> Any objections to removing the option in 10? > > I'm not sure I see the point. Redusing the number of configuration variables is an a-priori good. In aggregate, the more knobs we have, the harder it is to learn how to admin Postgres. Therefore any time a config variable becomes obsolete, we should remove it. -- -- Josh Berkus Red Hat OSAS (any opinions are my own)