Re: Initial review of xslt with no limits patch
Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
To: "David E. Wheeler" <david@kineticode.com>
Cc: Pavel Stehule <pavel.stehule@gmail.com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>, Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>, Mike Fowler <mike@mlfowler.com>, pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
Date: 2010-08-07T04:59:19Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
"David E. Wheeler" <david@kineticode.com> writes:
> I think that some sort of variadic pairs would be useful for this. But since there is no core "ordered pair" data type, I don't think you're going to get too far.
It's not immediately clear to me what an ordered-pair type would get you
that you don't get with 2-element arrays.
A couple of quick experiments suggest that 2-D arrays might be the thing
to use. They're easy to construct:
regression=# select array[[1,2],[3,4]];
array
---------------
{{1,2},{3,4}}
(1 row)
and you can build them dynamically at need:
regression=# select array[[1,2],[3,4]] || array[5,6];
?column?
---------------------
{{1,2},{3,4},{5,6}}
(1 row)
This is not exactly without precedent, either: our built-in xpath()
function appears to use precisely this approach for its namespace-list
argument.
regards, tom lane