Re: ltree_gist indexes broken after pg_upgrade from 12 to 13
Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>
From: Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>
To: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>, Tomas Vondra <tomas.vondra@enterprisedb.com>
Cc: PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org>
Date: 2022-02-25T01:51:41Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Hi, On February 24, 2022 5:44:57 PM PST, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: >Tomas Vondra <tomas.vondra@enterprisedb.com> writes: >> I wonder if we could check the index tuple length, and adjust the siglen >> based on that, somehow ... > >In an already-corrupted index, there won't be a unique answer. If we're breaking every ltree gist index, can we detect that it's not an index generated by the new version? Most people don't read release notes, and this is just about guaranteed to break all. -- Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.
Commits
Same data as JSON:
GET /api/v1/messages/:b64id/commits
the thread's linked commits as JSON, with link sources.
API reference →
-
Fix default signature length for gist_ltree_ops
- bad202c615c9 13.7 landed
- 7d30f59da714 14.3 landed
- 7e74aafc4335 15.0 landed
-
Implement operator class parameters
- 911e70207703 13.0 cited