Re: Patch: psql \whoami option
Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
To: David Christensen <david@endpoint.com>
Cc: Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net>, Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Date: 2010-01-27T15:43:04Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
David Christensen <david@endpoint.com> writes: > That's a good point about forward-compatibility. In that case, I'm > not sure if "default" is the best name for the human-readable format, > but I didn't like "human-readable" ;-). I assume that should have an > explicit spelling, and not just be the format that we get if we don't > otherwise specify. Ideas, anyone? I think this patch has near zero usecase already, and more than one output format is *definitely* a waste of time. Forget the argument and just print the "human readable" format. regards, tom lane