Horton

Re: Application name patch - v4

Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>

View thread View on postgr.es
From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
To: Marko Kreen <markokr@gmail.com>
Cc: Dave Page <dpage@pgadmin.org>, Heikki Linnakangas <heikki.linnakangas@enterprisedb.com>, Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>, Dimitri Fontaine <dfontaine@hi-media.com>
Date: 2009-12-01T20:18:31Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers 
Marko Kreen <markokr@gmail.com> writes:
> No, at least both pgbouncer and pgpool consider only (username, database)
> pair as pool identifier.  Rest of the startup params are tuned on the fly.
> And I think that should stay that way.

If you're happy with handling the existing connection parameters in a given
way, why would you not want application_name behaving that same way?

			regards, tom lane