Re: BUG #16199: pg_restore stuck on interrupts

Raúl Marín <admin@rmr.ninja>

From: Raúl Marín <admin@rmr.ninja>
To: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>, git@rmr.ninja
Cc: pgsql-bugs@lists.postgresql.org
Date: 2020-01-20T10:04:05Z
Lists: pgsql-bugs

Attachments

Hi,

After a little more than week with half of the servers in the farm 
patched, the issue has only appeared in the unpatched servers and I 
haven't seen any odd behaviour from the ones patched.


I'm attaching the patch applied for PG11, but it applies cleanly in 
master and PG12 too.

Regards,
Raúl Marín.



On 8/1/20 18:53, Raúl Marín wrote:
> On 8/1/20 18:13, Tom Lane wrote:
> 
>> You didn't actually say, but you must be interrupting parallel restores
>> with SIGINT or the like?
> 
> Yes, CI (Jenkins) is interrupted automatically with new pushes and 
> that's supposed to send a SIGTERM to the process group, which includes 
> the pg_restore process.
> 
> 
>> sigTermHandler tries to be safe to run in a signal context, but I'm
>> afraid we didn't think hard about what exit() might call.  The way
>> I'd be inclined to fix this is to call _exit() instead of exit(),
>> and the heck with what any atexit handlers think.  Can you try that
>> and see if it improves matters for you?
> 
> 
> Initially I didn't like this idea since that means not cleaning up 
> gnutls stuff, and modifying things related to crypto is always scary; 
> but following the same reasoning, I trust that any good cryto library 
> shouldn't leak anything important due to a fast exit.
> 
> I'll set up some of the servers to use _exit() for some days and see if 
> that fixes it.
> 
> Thanks!
> Raúl Marín.

Commits

  1. Fix pg_dump's sigTermHandler() to use _exit() not exit().