Re: POC, WIP: OR-clause support for indexes
Andrei Lepikhov <a.lepikhov@postgrespro.ru>
Commits
GET /api/v1/messages/:b64id/commits
the thread's linked commits as JSON, with link sources.
API reference →
-
Make group_similar_or_args() reorder clause list as little as possible
- 775a06d44c04 18.0 landed
-
Allow usage of match_orclause_to_indexcol() for joins
- 627d63419e22 18.0 landed
-
Skip not SOAP-supported indexes while transforming an OR clause into SAOP
- 5bba0546eecb 18.0 landed
-
Remove the wrong assertion from match_orclause_to_indexcol()
- d4d11940df94 18.0 landed
-
Teach bitmap path generation about transforming OR-clauses to SAOP's
- ae4569161a27 18.0 landed
-
Transform OR-clauses to SAOP's during index matching
- d4378c0005e6 18.0 landed
-
Fix the value of or_to_any_transform_limit in postgresql.conf.sample
- 2af75e117478 17.0 landed
-
Transform OR clauses to ANY expression
- 72bd38cc99a1 17.0 landed
-
MergeAttributes code deduplication
- 64444ce071f6 17.0 cited
-
SEARCH and CYCLE clauses
- 3696a600e229 14.0 cited
-
Improve estimation of OR clauses using extended statistics.
- 25a9e54d2db3 14.0 cited
-
Teach btree to handle ScalarArrayOpExpr quals natively.
- 9e8da0f75731 9.2.0 cited
-
Revise collation derivation method and expression-tree representation.
- b310b6e31ce5 9.1.0 cited
-
Instead of trying to force WHERE clauses into CNF or DNF normal form,
- 9888192fb773 8.0.0 cited
Attachments
- v22-1-0001-Transform-OR-clauses-to-ANY-expression.patch (text/plain) patch v22-0001
On 14/3/2024 16:31, Alexander Korotkov wrote: > On Wed, Mar 13, 2024 at 2:16 PM Andrei Lepikhov > <a.lepikhov@postgrespro.ru <mailto:a.lepikhov@postgrespro.ru>> wrote: > > On 13/3/2024 18:05, Alexander Korotkov wrote: > > > On Wed, Mar 13, 2024 at 7:52 AM Andrei Lepikhov > > > Given all of the above, I think moving transformation to the > > > canonicalize_qual() would be the right way to go. > > Ok, I will try to move the code. > > I have no idea about the timings so far. I recall the last time I got > > bogged down in tons of duplicated code. I hope with an almost-ready > > sketch, it will be easier. > > Thank you! I'll be looking forward to the updated patch. Okay, I moved the 0001-* patch to the prepqual.c module. See it in the attachment. I treat it as a transient patch. It has positive outcomes as well as negative ones. The most damaging result you can see in the partition_prune test: partition pruning, in some cases, moved to the executor initialization stage. I guess, we should avoid it somehow in the next version. -- regards, Andrei Lepikhov Postgres Professional