Horton

Re: Add Postgres module info

Chapman Flack <jcflack@acm.org>

View thread View on postgr.es
From: Chapman Flack <jcflack@acm.org>
To: "David E. Wheeler" <david@justatheory.com>, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Cc: Euler Taveira <euler@eulerto.com>, Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>, Andrei Lepikhov <lepihov@gmail.com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Date: 2024-12-24T03:48:26Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers 
On 12/23/24 17:26, David E. Wheeler wrote:
> On Dec 23, 2024, at 15:17, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
>> How would that work for extensions where the C code is intentionally
>> supporting multiple versions of the SQL objects?
> 
> I guess some people do that, eh? In that case it wouldn’t.

A function pointer rather than a version constant?

Or a function pointer, to be used if the version constant is null?

Regards,
-Chap

Commits

  1. Avoid mixing designated and non-designated field initializers.

  2. Use PG_MODULE_MAGIC_EXT in our installable shared libraries.

  3. Introduce PG_MODULE_MAGIC_EXT macro.