Re: pg_upgrade test for binary compatibility of core data types
Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>
Commits
GET /api/v1/messages/:b64id/commits
the thread's linked commits as JSON, with link sources.
API reference →
-
Move into separate file all the SQL queries used in pg_upgrade tests
- 1924d508c335 10.20 landed
- 0e603b75c434 11.15 landed
- b6e525648d72 12.10 landed
- fae5f08e1719 13.6 landed
- b6dac98b0561 14.2 landed
- 0df9641d3905 15.0 landed
-
Add table to regression tests for binary-compatibility checks in pg_upgrade
- a9993416f80f 12.10 landed
- 755f04c72ef1 13.6 landed
- cf3d79aa31f2 14.2 landed
- 835bcba8b8d7 15.0 landed
-
Fix tests of pg_upgrade across different major versions
- afa09e4a9af6 12.9 landed
- 2a8dee6a67cc 13.5 landed
- f4e1c8892b9e 14.1 landed
- fa66b6dee084 15.0 landed
-
Multirange datatypes
- 6df7a9698bb0 14.0 cited
-
Work around cross-version-upgrade issues created by commit 9e38c2bb5.
- 97f73a978fc1 14.0 cited
-
Declare assorted array functions using anycompatible not anyelement.
- 9e38c2bb5093 14.0 cited
-
Remove factorial operators, leaving only the factorial() function.
- 76f412ab3105 14.0 cited
-
Create by default sql/ and expected/ for output directory in pg_regress
- e78900afd217 14.0 cited
-
Add missing include to pg_upgrade/version.c
- bc3a94dc0005 9.4.25 landed
- 984aa0ede1d2 9.5.20 landed
- e09ab32a2205 9.6.16 landed
-
Improve the check for pg_catalog.line data type in pg_upgrade
- 235a52ca0f26 9.4.25 landed
- f57b01dd75ee 9.5.20 landed
- 0a643de08715 9.6.16 landed
- 2218fdca496b 10.11 landed
- a970b6cdebd1 11.6 landed
- ebb4caa9120d 12.1 landed
- 8d48e6a7240c 13.0 landed
-
Improve the check for pg_catalog.unknown data type in pg_upgrade
- e86ece22114d 10.11 landed
- d071a2539ff4 11.6 landed
- a8e49ae0c381 12.1 landed
- a524f50d0fc6 13.0 landed
-
Check for tables with sql_identifier during pg_upgrade
- eaf900e842ab 12.1 landed
- 0ccfc2822366 13.0 landed
-
pg_upgrade: clarify the database names in error files
- 1634d361577a 13.0 cited
-
In the pg_upgrade test suite, don't write to src/test/regress.
- 40b132c1afbb 12.0 cited
-
Allow group access on PGDATA
- c37b3d08ca68 11.0 cited
-
Refactor dir/file permissions
- da9b580d8990 11.0 cited
-
Remove unused functions in regress.c.
- db3af9feb19f 11.0 cited
-
Make WAL segment size configurable at initdb time.
- fc49e24fa69a 11.0 cited
-
Fix bit-rot in pg_upgrade's test.sh, and improve documentation.
- 5bab1985dfc2 10.0 cited
On 1/12/21 12:53 PM, Bruce Momjian wrote: > On Tue, Jan 12, 2021 at 11:27:53AM -0600, Justin Pryzby wrote: >> On Tue, Jan 12, 2021 at 12:15:59PM -0500, Bruce Momjian wrote: >>> Uh, what exactly is missing from the beta checklist? I read the patch >>> and commit message but don't understand it. >> Did you try to use test.sh to upgrade from a prior release ? >> >> Evidently it's frequently forgotten, as evidenced by all the "deferred >> maintenance" I had to do to allow testing the main patch (currently 0003). >> >> See also: >> >> commit 5bab1985dfc25eecf4b098145789955c0b246160 >> Author: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> >> Date: Thu Jun 8 13:48:27 2017 -0400 >> >> Fix bit-rot in pg_upgrade's test.sh, and improve documentation. >> >> Doing a cross-version upgrade test with test.sh evidently hasn't been >> tested since circa 9.2, because the script lacked case branches for >> old-version servers newer than 9.1. Future-proof that a bit, and >> clean up breakage induced by our recent drop of V0 function call >> protocol (namely that oldstyle_length() isn't in the regression >> suite anymore). > Oh, that is odd. I thought that was regularly run. I have my own test > infrastructure that I run for every major release so I never have run > the built-in one, except for make check-world. > Cross version pg_upgrade is tested regularly in the buildfarm, but not using test.sh. Instead it uses the saved data repository from a previous run of the buildfarm client for the source branch, and tries to upgrade that to the target branch. cheers andrew -- Andrew Dunstan EDB: https://www.enterprisedb.com