Re: row filtering for logical replication
Alexey Zagarin <zagarin@gmail.com>
Commits
GET /api/v1/messages/:b64id/commits
the thread's linked commits as JSON, with link sources.
API reference →
-
Release cache tuple when no longer needed
- ed0fbc8e5ac9 15.0 landed
-
Add some additional tests for row filters in logical replication.
- ceb57afd3ce1 15.0 landed
-
Fix one of the tests introduced in commit 52e4f0cd47.
- cfb4e209ec15 15.0 landed
-
Allow specifying row filters for logical replication of tables.
- 52e4f0cd472d 15.0 landed
-
Move scanint8() to numutils.c
- cfc7191dfea3 15.0 cited
-
Replace Test::More plans with done_testing
- 549ec201d613 15.0 cited
-
Reduce relcache access in WAL sender streaming logical changes
- 6ce16088bfed 15.0 cited
-
Small cleanups related to PUBLICATION framework code
- c9105dd3660f 15.0 cited
-
Add a view to show the stats of subscription workers.
- 8d74fc96db5f 15.0 cited
-
Allow publishing the tables of schema.
- 5a2832465fd8 15.0 cited
-
Doc: improve documentation of CREATE/ALTER SUBSCRIPTION.
- 1882d6cca161 15.0 cited
-
Add PublicationTable and PublicationRelInfo structs
- 0c6828fa987b 15.0 cited
-
Remove unused argument "txn" in maybe_send_schema().
- 93d573d86571 15.0 cited
-
Add prepare API support for streaming transactions in logical replication.
- 63cf61cdeb7b 15.0 cited
-
Unify PostgresNode's new() and get_new_node() methods
- 201a76183e20 15.0 cited
-
Use l*_node() family of functions where appropriate
- 2b00db4fb0c7 15.0 cited
-
Add support for prepared transactions to built-in logical replication.
- a8fd13cab0ba 15.0 cited
-
Restore the portal-level snapshot after procedure COMMIT/ROLLBACK.
- ef9480509622 11.13 cited
-
Rename a parse node to be more general
- 91d1f2d30210 14.0 landed
-
Remove unused column atttypmod from initial tablesync query
- 4ad31bb2ef25 14.0 landed
-
SEARCH and CYCLE clauses
- 3696a600e229 14.0 cited
I think that I also have found one shortcoming when using the setup described by Alexey Kondratov. The problem that I face is that if both (cloud and remote) tables already have data the moment I add the subscription, then the whole table is copied in both directions initially. Which leads to duplicated data and broken replication because COPY doesn't take into account the filtering condition. In case there are filters in a publication, the COPY command that is executed when adding a subscription (or altering one to refresh a publication) should also filter the data based on the same condition, e.g. COPY (SELECT * FROM ... WHERE ...) TO ... The current workaround is to always use WITH copy_data = false when subscribing or refreshing, and then manually copy data with the above statement. Alexey Zagarin On 1 Sep 2019 12:11 +0700, Euler Taveira <euler@timbira.com.br>, wrote: > Em ter, 27 de ago de 2019 às 18:10, <a.kondratov@postgrespro.ru> escreveu: > > > > Do you have any plans for continuing working on this patch and > > submitting it again on the closest September commitfest? There are only > > a few days left. Anyway, I will be glad to review the patch if you do > > submit it, though I didn't yet dig deeply into the code. > > > Sure. See my last email to this thread. I appreciate if you can review it. > > > Although almost all new tests are passed, there is a problem with DELETE > > replication, so 1 out of 10 tests is failed. It isn't replicated if the > > record was created with is_cloud=TRUE on cloud, replicated to remote; > > then updated with is_cloud=FALSE on remote, replicated to cloud; then > > deleted on remote. > > > That's because you don't include is_cloud in PK or REPLICA IDENTITY. I > add a small note in docs. > > > -- > Euler Taveira Timbira - > http://www.timbira.com.br/ > PostgreSQL: Consultoria, Desenvolvimento, Suporte 24x7 e Treinamento > > > >