Re: BEFORE UPDATE trigger on postgres_fdw table not work
Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
To: Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8@lab.ntt.co.jp>
Cc: Shohei Mochizuki <shohei.mochizuki@toshiba.co.jp>,
pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
Date: 2019-05-27T13:02:17Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8@lab.ntt.co.jp> writes: > On 2019/05/27 10:52, Shohei Mochizuki wrote: >> I noticed returning a modified record in a row-level BEFORE UPDATE trigger >> on postgres_fdw foreign tables do not work. Attached patch fixes this issue. >> This is because current fdw code adds only columns to RemoteSQL that were >> explicitly targets of the UPDATE as follows. > Yeah. So, the trigger execution correctly modifies the existing tuple > fetched from the remote server, but those changes are then essentially > discarded by postgres_fdw, that is, postgresExecForeignModify(). > ... Also, in the worst case, we'll end > up generating new query for every row being changed, because the trigger > may change different columns for different rows based on some condition. Perhaps, if the table has relevant BEFORE triggers, we should just abandon our attempts to optimize away fetching/storing all columns? It seems like another potential hazard here is a trigger needing to read a column that is not mentioned in the SQL query. regards, tom lane
Commits
-
postgres_fdw: Account for triggers in non-direct remote UPDATE planning.
- 1a3d9f62c1d1 9.4.23 landed
- eddb79705f65 9.5.18 landed
- 1ade21e7facc 9.6.14 landed
- 0f2b234263ef 10.9 landed
- 214460182161 11.4 landed
- 8b6da83d162c 12.0 landed
-
Offer triggers on foreign tables.
- 7cbe57c34dec 9.4.0 cited