Re: Horrible CREATE DATABASE Performance in High Sierra
Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
To: Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>
Cc: Brent Dearth <brent.dearth@gmail.com>, pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
Date: 2017-10-02T23:50:51Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> writes: > On 2017-10-02 18:33:17 -0400, Tom Lane wrote: >> I'm kind of surprised that machine B doesn't show obvious tanking in this >> test given that msync() makes it suck so badly at copying a database. >> I wonder what is different from the kernel's standpoint ... maybe the >> sheer number of different files mmap'd by a single process during the >> copy? > Yea, that's curious. I've really no clue about OSX, so pardon my > question: With HEAD and CREATE DATABASE, is it IO blocked or kernel cpu > blocked? What I saw was that the backend process was consuming 100% of (one) CPU, while the I/O transaction rate viewed by "iostat 1" started pretty low --- under 10% of what the machine is capable of --- and dropped from there as the copy proceeded. I did not think to check if that was user or kernel-space CPU, but I imagine it has to be the latter. regards, tom lane
Commits
-
Increase distance between flush requests during bulk file copies.
- c3723317d08c 10.1 landed
- 643c27e36ff3 11.0 landed
- 13a8924ecf00 9.6.6 landed