Re: Windows: openssl & gssapi dislike each other
Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>
From: Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>
To: Dave Page <dpage@pgadmin.org>, Daniel Gustafsson <daniel@yesql.se>
Cc: Imran Zaheer <imran.zhir@gmail.com>, Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>,
Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>,
PostgreSQL Developers <pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org>
Date: 2025-01-24T20:07:42Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Commits
Same data as JSON:
GET /api/v1/messages/:b64id/commits
the thread's linked commits as JSON, with link sources.
API reference →
-
Move GSSAPI includes into its own header
- e92c0632c147 18.0 landed
-
Tighten test_predtest's input checks, and improve error messages.
- 00ac25a3c365 17.0 cited
-
Collation documentation fixes.
- 8ba34c698d19 17.0 cited
-
contrib/sslinfo needs a fix too to make hamerkop happy.
- 568620dfd691 15.0 cited
-
Second attempt to silence SSL compile failures on hamerkop.
- 1241fcbd7e64 15.0 cited
On 2025-01-22 We 4:25 AM, Dave Page wrote: > > > On Wed, 22 Jan 2025 at 09:17, Daniel Gustafsson <daniel@yesql.se> wrote: > > > On 10 Jul 2024, at 19:06, Imran Zaheer <imran.zhir@gmail.com> wrote: > > (Reviving an old thread to give them a chance to finish before v18) > > > For now maybe we can do the future proofing for gssapi & openssl > includes > > and do testing if openssl clashes with some other lib too. > > Where did this end up, is compilation on Windows with OpenSSL and > GSSAPI still > an issue? AFAICT the fixes from this thread are yet to be applied > and it would > be nice to have that done before v18 if still needed. > > > I kid you not, 20 seconds ago I hit send on a message on a pgAdmin > thread where I was complaining this bug was outstanding to someone > asking about GSSAPI support on Windows. That's quite the coincidence. > > Anyway, no fix was committed as far as I know. I would suggest it > should be back-patched as well. > > I'm quite partial to the approach suggested upthread by Andres (a separate pg_gssapi.h file). If there's agreement on that I'm prepared to go and make it happen, unless Daniel beats me to it. Backpatching also seems reasonable. cheers andrew -- Andrew Dunstan EDB:https://www.enterprisedb.com