Re: Exposure related to GUC value of ssl_passphrase_command
Fujii Masao <masao.fujii@oss.nttdata.com>
From: Fujii Masao <masao.fujii@oss.nttdata.com>
To: "Moon, Insung" <tsukiwamoon.pgsql@gmail.com>,
Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentraut@2ndquadrant.com>
Cc: Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>,
Kyotaro Horiguchi <horikyota.ntt@gmail.com>, masao.fujii@gmail.com,
amitlangote09@gmail.com, pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org
Date: 2020-03-09T02:43:20Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On 2020/02/14 10:31, Moon, Insung wrote: > Dear Hackers. > > Thank you for an response. > I registered this entry in commifest of 2020-03. > # I registered in the security part, but if it is wrong, sincerely > apologize for this. > > And I'd like to review show authority to ssl_ * later and discuss it > in a separate thread. So, you are planning to start new discussion about this? Regards, -- Fujii Masao NTT DATA CORPORATION Advanced Platform Technology Group Research and Development Headquarters
Commits
-
Mark ssl_passphrase_command as GUC_SUPERUSER_ONLY.
- d9249441efc5 13.0 landed