Re: Unhappy thoughts about pg_dump and objects inherited from template1

Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>

From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
To: Jan Wieck <janwieck@Yahoo.com>
Cc: Philip Warner <pjw@rhyme.com.au>, pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
Date: 2000-11-09T15:50:29Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Jan Wieck <janwieck@Yahoo.com> writes:
>     For now we have oid's 1-16383 hardwired from the  bki  files.
>     Some  16384-xxxxx get allocated by initdb after bootstrap, so
>     we just need to bump the oid counter at the end of initdb (by
>     some  bootstrap  interface  command)  to  lets  say 32768 and
>     reject any attempt to touch an object with a lower oid.

What do you mean by "touch"?  The system catalogs certainly can't
be made read-only in general.

AFAIK we already have sufficient defenses against unwanted hackery on
the system catalogs, and so I don't really see a need for another level
of checking.

			regards, tom lane