Horton
Menu

Re: NetBSD/Alpha and rkirkpat's patch [was Re: regress failed tests.. SERIOUS?]

Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>

View thread
From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
To: "Thomas T. Thai" <tom@minnesota.com>
Cc: pgsql-bugs@postgresql.org, Brent Verner <brent@rcfile.org>, Ryan Kirkpatrick <pgsql@rkirkpat.net>, Adriaan Joubert <a.joubert@albourne.com>, Arrigo Triulzi <arrigo@albourne.com>
Date: 2000-12-31T04:21:04Z
Lists: pgsql-bugs, pgsql-general 
"Thomas T. Thai" <tom@minnesota.com> writes:
>> Uh, why are you altering NS32K code in an Alpha patch?  I did not apply
>> this.

> cause egcs on NetBSD/Alpha will give lots of error during compile. we
> don't have gcc 2.95.2 on the alpha working yet.

But the proposed diff is inside #if defined(NEED_NS32K_TAS_ASM).
How can that affect an Alpha compilation at all?

			regards, tom lane