Re: Fix to increment the index scan counter for the bloom filter index
Masahiro Ikeda <ikedamsh@oss.nttdata.com>
From: Masahiro Ikeda <ikedamsh@oss.nttdata.com>
To: Peter Geoghegan <pg@bowt.ie>
Cc: pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
Date: 2024-11-13T00:45:04Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On 2024-11-13 06:23, Peter Geoghegan wrote: > On Tue, Nov 12, 2024 at 5:01 AM Masahiro Ikeda > <ikedamsh@oss.nttdata.com> wrote: >> I noticed that the bloom filter index forgets to increment the index >> scan counter >> while reviewing the skip scan patch [1]. It seems this was simply >> overlooked in >> the implementation. What do you think? > > I think that you're right. > > I'll commit this and backpatch once the release tags for the pending > set of point releases are pushed. OK, thanks. Regards, -- Masahiro Ikeda NTT DATA CORPORATION
Commits
-
Count contrib/bloom index scans in pgstat view.
- 93063e2e429b 18.0 landed
- 7af6d13061ee 17.2 landed
- 05aac2e83752 16.6 landed
- 16a2bb0793ac 15.10 landed
- 2a30b6836db4 14.15 landed
- e493ea866ebb 13.18 landed