Thread

  1. Re: Use merge-based matching for MCVs in eqjoinsel

    Ilia Evdokimov <ilya.evdokimov@tantorlabs.com> — 2025-09-10T13:56:03Z

    Hi!
    
    On 09.09.2025 12:22, David Geier wrote:
    > Could you please do that with the latest attached patch so that we test
    > it once more?
    
    
    LGTM. Yes, I'll test this patch.
    
    >
    > Could you also run once more the JOB benchmark to get some test coverage
    > on the SEMI join code (assuming it also uses SEMI joins)?
    
    
    Unfortunately, the JOB benchmark does not contain semi join nodes. 
    However, TPC-DS does. I'll look for the queries with slowest planner 
    times there and check them.
    
    I'll need some time to check both join and semi join cases with small 
    and large default_statistics_target. I'll share the results later.
    
    >
    > Once we've concluded on above and there are no objections, I will
    > register this patch in the commit fest.
    
    
    Sure. No problem.
    
    -- 
    Best regards,
    Ilia Evdokimov,
    Tantor Labs LLC,
    https://tantorlabs.com