Re: doc: create table improvements
Chao Li <li.evan.chao@gmail.com>
From: Chao Li <li.evan.chao@gmail.com>
To: Laurenz Albe <laurenz.albe@cybertec.at>
Cc: "David G. Johnston" <david.g.johnston@gmail.com>,
Peter Eisentraut <peter@eisentraut.org>,
PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org>,
jian he <jian.universality@gmail.com>
Date: 2025-12-16T02:14:00Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Commits
Same data as JSON:
GET /api/v1/messages/:b64id/commits
the thread's linked commits as JSON, with link sources.
API reference →
-
Doc: declutter CREATE TABLE synopsis.
- a6d26e0fb29b 19 (unreleased) landed
-
Remove support for unlogged on partitioned tables
- e2bab2d79204 18.0 cited
> On Oct 23, 2025, at 12:43, Laurenz Albe <laurenz.albe@cybertec.at> wrote: > > On Mon, 2025-10-20 at 07:41 -0400, David G. Johnston wrote: >> I question whether “parameter” is even the correct class to assign here >> and so would rather avoid the issue by not assigning a class. > > Right. I have removed the vestiges from my failed attempt to improve > the "parameter" decorations. > >> “If none is specified, the data will be persistent” would be better >> written “If unspecified the data will be persistent” (or, “if not specified…”) > > I decided to use the trusted phrasing "by default". > >> Everything else looks good. > > Patch attached; if it is fine with you, I'll mark it "ready for committer". > > Yours, > Laurenz Albe > <v4-0001-Unclutter-CREATE-TABLE-synopsis.patch> Overall the change looks good to me. I have only one comment about the naming of “oversize_storage”. Why not just “storage_parameters” or similar that sounds more straightforward? Best regards, -- Chao Li (Evan) HighGo Software Co., Ltd. https://www.highgo.com/