Re: pg_stat_get_replication_slot() marked not strict, crashes

Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> writes:
> On 2022-03-28 08:28:29 +0530, Amit Kapila wrote:
>> I am not sure if for 14 we can make a catalog change as that would
>> require catversion bump, so adding a code-level check as suggested by
>> Andres seems like a better option. Andres/Tom, any better ideas for
>> this?

> I think we could do the catalog change too, so that future initdb's are marked
> correctly. But we obviously do need the code-level check nevertheless.

Yeah.  We have to install the C-level check, so I don't see any
point in changing the catalogs in back branches.  That'll create
confusion while not saving anything.

			regards, tom lane