Re: initdb and fsync
Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
To: Andres Freund <andres@2ndquadrant.com>
Cc: Jeff Davis <pgsql@j-davis.com>, pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>
Date: 2012-07-13T18:19:44Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Andres Freund <andres@2ndquadrant.com> writes: > On Tuesday, June 19, 2012 07:22:02 PM Jeff Davis wrote: >> Right now I'm inclined to leave the patch as-is. > Fine with that, I wanted to bring it up and see it documented. > I have marked it with ready for committer. That committer needs to decide on - > N in the regression tests or not, but that shouldn't be much of a problem ;) I'm picking up this patch now. What I'm inclined to do about the -N business is to commit without that, so that we get a round of testing in the buildfarm and find out about any portability issues, but then change to use -N after a week or so. I agree that in the long run we don't want regression tests to run with fsyncs by default. regards, tom lane