Re: Better shared data structure management and resizable shared data structures
Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka@iki.fi>
On 12/03/2026 19:03, Robert Haas wrote: > On Fri, Mar 6, 2026 at 9:13 AM Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka@iki.fi> wrote: >> 1. _PG_init() gets called early at postmaster startup, if the library is >> in shared_preload_libraries. If it's not in shared_preload_libraries, it >> gets called whenever the module is loaded. >> >> 2. The library can install a shmem_request_hook, which gets called early >> at postmaster startup, but after initializing the MaxBackends GUC. It >> only gets called when the library is loaded via shared_preload_libraries. >> >> 3. The library can install a shmem_startup_hook. It gets called later at >> postmaster startup, after the shared memory segment has been allocated. >> In EXEC_BACKEND mode it also gets called at backend startup. It does not >> get called if the library is not listed in shared_preload_libraries. >> >> None of these is quite the right moment to call the new >> ShmemRegisterStruct() function. _PG_init() is too early if the extension >> needs MaxBackends for sizing the shared memory area. shmem_request_hook >> is otherwise good, but in EXEC_BACKEND mode, the ShmemRegisterStruct() >> function needs to also be called backend startup and shmem_request_hook >> is not called at backend startup. shmem_startup_hook() is too late. > > I believe that the design goal of > 4f2400cb3f10aa79f99fba680c198237da28dd38 was to make it so that people > who had working extensions already didn't need to change their code, > but those for whom the restrictions of doing things in _PG_init were > annoying would have a workable alternative. I think that's a pretty > good goal, although I don't feel we absolutely have to stick to it. It > could easily be worth breaking that if we get something cool out of > it. But is there a reason we can't make it so that this new mechanism > can be used either from _PG_init() or shmem_startup_hook()? (I assume > there is or you likely would have done it already, but it's not clear > to me what that reason is.) shmem_startup_hook() is too late. The shmem structs need to be registered at postmaster startup before the shmem segment is allocated, so that we can calculate the total size needed. I'm currently leaning towards _PG_init(), except for allocations that depend on MaxBackends. For those, you can install a shmem_request_hook that sets the size in the descriptor. In other words, you can leave the 'size' as empty in _PG_init(), but set it later in the shmem_request_hook. Another option is to add a new bespoken callback in the descriptor for such size adjustments, which would get called at the same time as shmem_request_hook. That might be a little more ergonomic, there would no longer be any need for extensions to use the old shmem_request/startup_hooks with the new ShmemRegisterStruct() mechanism. Except that you'd still need them for RequestNamedLWLockTranche(). I wonder if we should recommend extensions to embed the LWLock struct into their shared memory struct and use the LWLockInitialize() and LWLockNewTrancheId() functions instead. That fits the new ShmemRegisterStruct() API a little better than RequestNamedLWLockTranche(). - Heikki
Commits
GET /api/v1/messages/:b64id/commits
the thread's linked commits as JSON, with link sources.
API reference →
-
Tidy up #ifdef USE_INJECTION_POINTS guards
- 9480c585df6c 19 (unreleased) landed
-
Convert all remaining subsystems to use the new shmem allocation API
- 9b5acad3f40f 19 (unreleased) landed
-
Convert buffer manager to use the new shmem allocation functions
- a4b6139dcceb 19 (unreleased) landed
-
Add alignment option to ShmemRequestStruct()
- dacfe81a0de5 19 (unreleased) landed
-
Convert AIO to use the new shmem allocation functions
- 58a1573385ed 19 (unreleased) landed
-
Convert SLRUs to use the new shmem allocation functions
- 2e0943a8597e 19 (unreleased) landed
-
Refactor shmem initialization code in predicate.c
- 4c9eca5afea0 19 (unreleased) landed
-
Use the new shmem allocation functions in a few core subsystems
- c6d55714ba4c 19 (unreleased) landed
-
Convert lwlock.c to use the new shmem allocation functions
- a006bc7b1699 19 (unreleased) landed
-
Introduce a registry of built-in shmem subsystems
- 1fc2e9fbc0a3 19 (unreleased) landed
-
Convert pg_stat_statements to use the new shmem allocation functions
- d4885af3d653 19 (unreleased) landed
-
Add a test module to test after-startup shmem allocations
- 6409994c7dd8 19 (unreleased) landed
-
Introduce a new mechanism for registering shared memory areas
- 283e823f9dcb 19 (unreleased) landed
-
Move some code from shmem.c and shmem.h
- 6ef9bee29310 19 (unreleased) landed
-
Improve test_lwlock_tranches
- 92a685e4070d 19 (unreleased) landed
-
Test pg_stat_statements across crash restart
- 148fe2b05df5 19 (unreleased) landed
-
Refactor PredicateLockShmemInit to not reuse var for different things
- 3fd057772827 19 (unreleased) landed
-
Refactor ShmemIndex initialization
- 6b8238cb6aa7 19 (unreleased) landed
-
Add a new shmem_request_hook hook.
- 4f2400cb3f10 15.0 cited