Horton

Re: Towards easier AMs: Cleaning up inappropriate use of name "relkind"

Mark Dilger <mark.dilger@enterprisedb.com>

View thread View on postgr.es
From: Mark Dilger <mark.dilger@enterprisedb.com>
To: Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>
Cc: Daniel Gustafsson <daniel@yesql.se>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org>
Date: 2020-07-11T16:23:34Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers 

> On Jul 10, 2020, at 9:44 PM, Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz> wrote:
> 
> On Wed, Jul 08, 2020 at 10:00:47PM +0900, Michael Paquier wrote:
>> There are two patches on this thread v2-0001 being much smaller than
>> v2-0002.  I have looked at 0001 for now, and, like Alvaro, this
>> renaming makes sense to me.  Those commands work on objects that are
>> relkinds, except for one OBJECT_TYPE.  So, let's get 0001 patch
>> merged.  Any objections from others?
> 
> I have been through this one again and applied it as cc35d89.
> --
> Michael

Thanks for committing!

—
Mark Dilger
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

Commits

  1. Rename field "relkind" to "objtype" for CTAS and ALTER TABLE nodes