Re: BUG #18077: PostgreSQL server subprocess crashed by a SELECT statement with WITH clause
Andrei Lepikhov <a.lepikhov@postgrespro.ru>
From: "Lepikhov Andrei" <a.lepikhov@postgrespro.ru>
To: "Richard Guo" <guofenglinux@gmail.com>
Cc: "Tom Lane" <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>, fuboat@outlook.com,
pgsql-bugs@lists.postgresql.org
Date: 2023-09-06T07:14:40Z
Lists: pgsql-bugs
On Wed, Sep 6, 2023, at 1:55 PM, Richard Guo wrote: > On Wed, Sep 6, 2023 at 11:40 AM Lepikhov Andrei > <a.lepikhov@postgrespro.ru> wrote: >> Hi, >> >> I am writing here just because you change this specific part of code. >> Designing a custom node I found the problem with CTE and Subqueries. The reproduction sample looks quite similar to yours: >> >> create view tt24v as >> with cte as materialized (select r from (values(1,2),(3,4)) r) >> select (r).column2 as col_a, (rr).column2 as col_b from >> cte join (select rr from (values(1,7),(3,8)) rr limit 2) ss >> on (r).column1 = (rr).column1; >> explain (verbose, costs off) select * from tt24v; >> >> but fails with the error "failed to find plan for CTE ..." with a custom node over a JOIN. > > The error message indicates that something must have gone wrong. I > don't know well enough about custom scan, but I cannot reproduce this > error with your query. Am I missing something? Yeah, you should design cusom node to reproduce it. I can't publish my current code, but will try to invent a simple example. -- Regards, Andrei Lepikhov
Commits
-
Track nesting depth correctly when drilling down into RECORD Vars.
- e0e492e5a928 17.0 landed
- d29812c0c6cd 12.17 landed
- c5b7f791dab9 13.13 landed
- ae13f8166dc3 14.10 landed
- a374f6c61681 11.22 landed
- 53630f12d39b 16.1 landed
- 2679a107a152 15.5 landed
-
Fix get_expr_result_type() to find field names for RECORD Consts.
- 8a15b4178c40 12.17 landed
- 59bc0dfe44a6 13.13 landed
- 479b99125dcc 11.22 landed
-
Allow extracting fields from a ROW() expression in more cases.
- ece1154f4c89 11.22 landed
- 2f02d4a2b9cb 12.17 landed