Re: Unicode normalization SQL functions

On 2020-03-23 17:26, Daniel Verite wrote:
> 	Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> 
>> What is that status of this patch set?  I think we have nailed down the
>> behavior, but there were some concerns about certain performance
>> characteristics.  Do people feel that those are required to be addressed
>> in this cycle?
> 
> Not finding any other issue with v3 or objections in the thread,
> I've set the status to Ready For Committer in the CF.

I have committed the 0001 patch.

Now I have some concerns about the size of the new table in 
unicode_normprops_table.h, and the resulting binary size.  At the very 
least, we should probably make that #ifndef FRONTEND or something like 
that so libpq isn't bloated by it unnecessarily.  Perhaps there is a 
better format for that table?  Any ideas?

-- 
Peter Eisentraut              http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services