Re: Allowing multiple concurrent base backups
Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
To: Heikki Linnakangas <heikki.linnakangas@enterprisedb.com>
Cc: PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>, Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net>
Date: 2011-01-11T18:51:20Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Heikki Linnakangas <heikki.linnakangas@enterprisedb.com> writes: > I implemented this in two ways, and can't decide which I like better: > 1. The contents of the backup label file are returned to the caller of > do_pg_start_backup() as a palloc'd string. > 2. do_pg_start_backup() creates a temporary file that the backup label > is written to (instead of "backup_label"). > Implementation 1 changes more code, as pg_start/stop_backup() need to be > changed to write/read from memory instead of file, but the result isn't > any more complicated. Nevertheless, I somehow feel more comfortable with 2. Seems like either one of these is fairly problematic in that you have to have some monstrous kluge to get the backup_label file to appear with the right name in the tarfile. How badly do we actually need this? I don't think the use-case for concurrent base backups is all that large in practice given the I/O hit it's going to involve. regards, tom lane