Horton
Menu

Re: FUNC_MAX_ARGS benchmarks

Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>

View thread
From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
To: Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>
Cc: Joe Conway <mail@joeconway.com>, Thomas Lockhart <lockhart@fourpalms.org>, Neil Conway <nconway@klamath.dyndns.org>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Date: 2002-08-04T02:15:26Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers 
Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us> writes:
> OK, time to get moving folks.  Looks like the increase in the function
> args to 32 and the NAMEDATALEN to 128 has been sufficiently tested.

I'm convinced by Joe's numbers that FUNC_MAX_ARGS = 32 shouldn't hurt
too much.  But have we done equivalent checks on NAMEDATALEN?  In
particular, do we know what it does to the size of template1?

			regards, tom lane