Re: standard_conforming_strings
Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
Cc: Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com>, Cédric Villemain <cedric.villemain.debian@gmail.com>, Alex Hunsaker <badalex@gmail.com>, Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Date: 2010-07-14T15:37:18Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> writes: > On Fri, Jan 29, 2010 at 10:02 PM, Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com> wrote: > An actual plan here might look like "let's flip it before 9.1alpha1 > so we can get some alpha testing cycles on it" ... >> >> "Hey, let's flip it in 9.1 CF 1, so that we can have some alpha testing >> cycles on it." > Should we do this? Patch attached. I'm still scared to death of the security implications, but if we don't do it now, when will be a better time? Might as well try it and see what breaks. Note there had better be a large compatibility warning in the alpha release notes, and we had better pester driver authors to test with 9.1alpha1 as soon as it's out. regards, tom lane