Thread

Commits

  1. doc: Update note about source code formatting

  1. Do not use C++ style comments (// comments). Strict ANSI C compilers do not accept them.

    The Post Office <noreply@postgresql.org> — 2019-09-23T14:39:06Z

    The following documentation comment has been logged on the website:
    
    Page: https://www.postgresql.org/docs/11/source-format.html
    Description:
    
    This sentence in the style guide feels outdated. // style comments have been
    in the ANSI C standard for almost 20 years now (C99 was accepted as ANSI
    standard in may 2000). I suggest rewording this to "Do not use C99 style
    comments (// comments). Strict C89 compilers do not accept them." or come up
    with some other reason for /**/ style being preferred to // style since I'm
    not entierly convinced postgres compiles on C89 anyways.
    
  2. Re: Do not use C++ style comments (// comments). Strict ANSI C compilers do not accept them.

    Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentraut@2ndquadrant.com> — 2019-09-24T22:11:00Z

    On 2019-09-23 16:39, PG Doc comments form wrote:
    > The following documentation comment has been logged on the website:
    > 
    > Page: https://www.postgresql.org/docs/11/source-format.html
    > Description:
    > 
    > This sentence in the style guide feels outdated. // style comments have been
    > in the ANSI C standard for almost 20 years now (C99 was accepted as ANSI
    > standard in may 2000). I suggest rewording this to "Do not use C99 style
    > comments (// comments). Strict C89 compilers do not accept them." or come up
    > with some other reason for /**/ style being preferred to // style since I'm
    > not entierly convinced postgres compiles on C89 anyways.
    
    PostgreSQL 12 requires C99, so those guidelines should probably be
    rephrased from "because old compilers don't accept it" to "because we
    like it that way".
    
    -- 
    Peter Eisentraut              http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
    PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
    
    
    
    
  3. Re: Do not use C++ style comments (// comments). Strict ANSI C compilers do not accept them.

    Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> — 2019-09-24T22:13:13Z

    Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentraut@2ndquadrant.com> writes:
    > PostgreSQL 12 requires C99, so those guidelines should probably be
    > rephrased from "because old compilers don't accept it" to "because we
    > like it that way".
    
    Yeah, or more formally "to encourage consistent coding style".
    
    			regards, tom lane
    
    
    
    
  4. Re: Do not use C++ style comments (// comments). Strict ANSI C compilers do not accept them.

    Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentraut@2ndquadrant.com> — 2019-09-26T08:53:43Z

    On 2019-09-25 00:13, Tom Lane wrote:
    > Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentraut@2ndquadrant.com> writes:
    >> PostgreSQL 12 requires C99, so those guidelines should probably be
    >> rephrased from "because old compilers don't accept it" to "because we
    >> like it that way".
    > 
    > Yeah, or more formally "to encourage consistent coding style".
    
    fixed
    
    -- 
    Peter Eisentraut              http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
    PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
    
    
    
    
  5. Re: Do not use C++ style comments (// comments). Strict ANSI C compilers do not accept them.

    Anders Åstrand <andast@kth.se> — 2019-09-30T09:18:46Z

    <div dir='auto'>Thanks for your attention! That sentence made me believe the style guide was outdated, but then I found fairly recent posts referring to it and got confused.</div><div class="gmail_extra"><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Sep 26, 2019 10:53, Peter Eisentraut &lt;peter.eisentraut@2ndquadrant.com&gt; wrote:<br type="attribution" /><blockquote class="quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><p dir="ltr">On 2019-09-25 00:13, Tom Lane wrote:&#13;<br>
    &gt; Peter Eisentraut &lt;peter.eisentraut@2ndquadrant.com&gt; writes:&#13;<br>
    &gt;&gt; PostgreSQL 12 requires C99, so those guidelines should probably be&#13;<br>
    &gt;&gt; rephrased from "because old compilers don't accept it" to "because we&#13;<br>
    &gt;&gt; like it that way".&#13;<br>
    &gt; &#13;<br>
    &gt; Yeah, or more formally "to encourage consistent coding style".&#13;<br>
    &#13;<br>
    fixed&#13;<br>
    &#13;<br>
    -- &#13;<br>
    Peter Eisentraut&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/&#13;<br>
    PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training &amp; Services&#13;<br>
    </p>
    </blockquote></div><br></div>