Re: [PATCH] Support % wildcard in extension upgrade filenames

> On 28 May 2022, at 16:50, Laurenz Albe <laurenz.albe@cybertec.at> wrote:

> I don't think this idea is fundamentally wrong, but I have two worries:
> 
> 1. It would be a good idea good to make sure that there is not both
> "extension--%--2.0.sql" and "extension--1.0--2.0.sql" present.
> Otherwise the behavior might be indeterministic.
> 
> 2. What if you have a "postgis--%--3.3.sql", and somebody tries to upgrade
> their PostGIS 1.1 installation with it? Would that work?
> Having a lower bound for a matching version might be a good idea,
> although I have no idea how to do that.

Following that reasoning, couldn't a rogue actor inject a fake file (perhaps
bundled with another innocent looking extension) which takes precedence in
wildcard matching?

--
Daniel Gustafsson		https://vmware.com/