Horton

Re: [PATCH] Add CANONICAL option to xmlserialize

Jim Jones <jim.jones@uni-muenster.de>

View thread
From: Jim Jones <jim.jones@uni-muenster.de>
To: Pavel Stehule <pavel.stehule@gmail.com>
Cc: Chapman Flack <chap@anastigmatix.net>, vignesh C <vignesh21@gmail.com>, Thomas Munro <thomas.munro@gmail.com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org>, Vik Fearing <vik@postgresfriends.org>
Date: 2024-08-26T14:29:58Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers 

On 26.08.24 14:15, Pavel Stehule wrote:
> I am not strongly against enhancing XMLSERIALIZE, but it can be nice
> to see some wider concept first. Currently the state looks just random
> - and I didn't see any serious discussion about implementation fo
> SQL/XML. We don't need to be necessarily compatible with Oracle, but
> it can help if we have a functionality that can be used for conversions.

Fair point. A road map definitely wouldn't hurt. Not quite sure how to
start this motion though :D
So far I've just picked the missing SQL/XML features that were listed in
the PostgreSQL todo list and that I need for any of my projects. But I
would gladly change the priorities if there is any interest in the
community for specific features.

-- 
Jim