Re: BUG #19042: Option --help not recognized at the end of command line in pg_restore
Peter Eisentraut <peter@eisentraut.org>
From: Peter Eisentraut <peter@eisentraut.org>
To: Daniel Gustafsson <daniel@yesql.se>, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Cc: Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart@gmail.com>, Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>, Matthias Hörmann <matthias.hoermann@saltation.com>, pgsql-bugs@lists.postgresql.org
Date: 2025-11-03T20:57:23Z
Lists: pgsql-bugs
On 29.10.25 21:19, Daniel Gustafsson wrote: > > >> On 29 Oct 2025, at 17:54, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: >> >> Peter Eisentraut <peter@eisentraut.org> writes: >>>> On 25.10.25 00:26, Daniel Gustafsson wrote: >>>> While hacking on this it seemed like a good idea to move to using progname >>>> consistently, and reduce scope in some places from global variables, but >>>> looking at it now I'm less convinced. At the very least it should be ripped >>>> out into its own patch but for now those changes are left in there. >> >>> The --version outputs intentionally do not use progname, so that you get >>> a proper identification of the program and version independent of what >>> the binary might be called. Please don't change that. > > All callsites using handle_help_version_opts were already using progname for —version, this just made it consistent. That being said, I can change it to be consistent in the other direction. AFAICT, handle_help_version_opts() does this correctly: It takes an argument fixed_progname that is used for --version output, while for the --help output it uses argv. And most callers provide a fixed string for fixed_progname, but I see that some don't. >> Hmm, that's important institutional knowledge that should be captured >> somewhere. > > Maybe a README in src/bin? Maybe just a better code comment at handle_help_version_opts().