Re: Support for NSS as a libpq TLS backend

Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentraut@enterprisedb.com>

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentraut@enterprisedb.com>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>, Daniel Gustafsson <daniel@yesql.se>
Cc: Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>, Julien Rouhaud <rjuju123@gmail.com>, Jacob Champion <pchampion@vmware.com>, "pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org" <pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org>, "hlinnaka@iki.fi" <hlinnaka@iki.fi>, "andrew.dunstan@2ndquadrant.com" <andrew.dunstan@2ndquadrant.com>, "michael@paquier.xyz" <michael@paquier.xyz>, "thomas.munro@gmail.com" <thomas.munro@gmail.com>, "sfrost@snowman.net" <sfrost@snowman.net>
Date: 2022-02-03T14:07:42Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On 28.01.22 15:30, Robert Haas wrote:
> I would really, really like to have an alternative to OpenSSL for PG.

What are the reasons people want that?  With OpenSSL 3, the main reasons 
-- license and FIPS support -- have gone away.




Commits

  1. Add tab-completion for CREATE FOREIGN TABLE.

  2. Add tap tests for the schema publications.

  3. Move Perl test modules to a better namespace

  4. Adjust configure to insist on Perl version >= 5.8.3.

  5. Simplify code related to compilation of SSL and OpenSSL

  6. Introduce --with-ssl={openssl} as a configure option

  7. Implement support for bulk inserts in postgres_fdw

  8. Fix redundant error messages in client tools

  9. doc: Apply more consistently <productname> markup for OpenSSL

  10. Check ssl_in_use flag when reporting statistics