Re: [PATCH] 8.5 TODO: Add comments to output indicating version of pg_dump and of the database server

Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Cc: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@commandprompt.com>, Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com>, Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>, Jim Cox <shakahshakah@gmail.com>, pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>, David Fetter <david@fetter.org>
Date: 2010-02-23T19:19:51Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On Tue, Feb 23, 2010 at 1:47 PM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@commandprompt.com> writes:
>> Tom Lane escribió:
>>> That would be an argument for sticking this in the next CF, not for
>>> applying it now --- it was submitted after the close of the last CF no?
>
>> Sep. 29 2009?
>
> Oh, I was thinking it had just come in recently, but looking back you're
> right.  It did slip through the cracks.
>
> However, has the patch actually been reviewed?  pg_dump is a piece of
> code where it is notoriously easy for novices to do things wrong,
> and this is especially true for adding output that should only come out
> in particular cases.

It's a fairly trivial patch.  I took a quick look at it.  It needs
more than that, but I think not too much more.  I think it would be
less effort for someone to review it and make a decision than it would
be to keep it as an open item for the next 6 months.  But that's just
MHO: if the consensus is to postpone it, then let's just do that and
move on.

...Robert