Re: knngist patch support
Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Cc: Teodor Sigaev <teodor@sigaev.ru>, Oleg Bartunov <oleg@sai.msu.su>, tomas@tuxteam.de, "Ragi Y. Burhum" <rburhum@gmail.com>, Pgsql Hackers <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Date: 2010-02-13T18:31:44Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Attachments
- syscache5-v1.patch (application/octet-stream) patch v1
On Sat, Feb 13, 2010 at 1:28 PM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > Teodor Sigaev <teodor@sigaev.ru> writes: >> I see your point. May be it's better to introduce new system table? pg_amorderop >> to store ordering operations for index. > > We could, but that approach doesn't scale to wanting more categories > in the future --- you're essentially decreeing that every new category > of opclass-associated operator will require a new system catalog, > along with all the infrastructure needed for that. That guarantees > that the temptation to take shortcuts will remain high. Yeah. PFA a patch to allow 5-key syscaches. ...Robert