Re: HS/SR and smart shutdown

Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Cc: Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com>, Fujii Masao <masao.fujii@gmail.com>, pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
Date: 2010-01-21T01:58:19Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On Wed, Jan 20, 2010 at 8:56 PM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> writes:
>> On Wed, Jan 20, 2010 at 8:44 PM, Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com> wrote:
>>> Well, as long as streaming rep is running, you can't do a smart shutdown
>>> ... smart shutdown seems to treat the walreciever as a client
>>> connection.  At the very least, this should be in the documentation.
>
>> How hard is it to fix?
>
> I think the first question is do we *want* to fix it, or is it
> appropriate behavior?
>
> If the master shuts down, will the slaves try to fail over to become
> masters?  When the master restarts, will the slaves automatically
> reconnect?  If these questions have the wrong answers, shutting down the
> master isn't something to be done lightly, and automatically
> disconnecting slaves would be a real bad idea.

I thought the scenario in question was that someone wanted to manually
shut down the slave.  Am I misunderstanding?

...Robert