Re: damage control mode

Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
To: Dimitri Fontaine <dfontaine@hi-media.com>
Cc: Greg Smith <greg@2ndquadrant.com>, Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>, David Fetter <david@fetter.org>, Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Date: 2010-01-12T17:52:20Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On Tue, Jan 12, 2010 at 4:19 AM, Dimitri Fontaine
<dfontaine@hi-media.com> wrote:
> Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> writes:
>> I agree.  My main concern in terms of dealing with these outstanding
>> is that it will distract us, particularly Tom, from stabilizing the
>> tree, especially HS, VF, and SR.  If the tree were in a releasable
>> state today I wouldn't be worrying about it.
>
> You sound like you want to drop the last Commit Fest and prepare beta
> instead.

I think I was pretty clear about what I was proposing in the message
with which I started this thread - bump some or all the big,
outstanding patches to leave more time for stabilizing the tree.

Almost everyone said "no".  That's the community's decision and I
accept it, but IMHO it's a tacit decision to slip the release.

...Robert