Re: damage control mode
Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
To: Dimitri Fontaine <dfontaine@hi-media.com>
Cc: Greg Smith <greg@2ndquadrant.com>, Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>, David Fetter <david@fetter.org>, Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Date: 2010-01-12T17:52:20Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On Tue, Jan 12, 2010 at 4:19 AM, Dimitri Fontaine <dfontaine@hi-media.com> wrote: > Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> writes: >> I agree. My main concern in terms of dealing with these outstanding >> is that it will distract us, particularly Tom, from stabilizing the >> tree, especially HS, VF, and SR. If the tree were in a releasable >> state today I wouldn't be worrying about it. > > You sound like you want to drop the last Commit Fest and prepare beta > instead. I think I was pretty clear about what I was proposing in the message with which I started this thread - bump some or all the big, outstanding patches to leave more time for stabilizing the tree. Almost everyone said "no". That's the community's decision and I accept it, but IMHO it's a tacit decision to slip the release. ...Robert