Re: Removing pg_migrator limitations
Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
To: Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>
Cc: PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org>
Date: 2009-12-28T15:58:30Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On Mon, Dec 28, 2009 at 10:48 AM, Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> wrote: > Robert Haas wrote: >> On Sun, Dec 27, 2009 at 2:16 PM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> wrote: >> > On Sun, Dec 27, 2009 at 9:53 AM, Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> wrote: >> >> Bruce Momjian wrote: >> >>> There are several pg_migrator limitations that appeared late in the 8.4 >> >>> development cycle and were impossible to fix at that point. ?I would >> >>> like to fix them for Postgres 8.5: >> >>> >> >>> ? ? ? ? o ?a user-defined composite data type >> >>> ? ? ? ? o ?a user-defined array data type >> >>> ? ? ? ? o ?a user-defined enum data type >> >> >> >> FYI, these pg_migrator restrictions are now gone when migrating to PG >> >> 8.5, even _from_ PG 8.3. >> > >> > Wow, cool. ?That seems like a good step forward. >> >> It appears that the pg_migrator README needs a bit of revision to make >> it more clear which limitations apply to migration between which >> versions. In particular, the current wording suggests that NONE of >> the limitations apply to 8.3 -> 8.5 migrations, which is not the case >> - e.g. we haven't done anything about the need to rebuild certain >> types of indices. > > Very true. I have just made a new pg_migrator release with an updated > README file. Ah, cool. So this seems to imply that a migration from 8.4 to 8.5 should be clear sailing. Is that correct? ...Robert