Re: CommitFest 2009-09, two weeks on
Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
To: Hans-Jürgen Schönig <hs@cybertec.at>
Cc: Michael Meskes <meskes@postgresql.org>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@commandprompt.com>, Boszormenyi Zoltan <zb@cybertec.at>, Dan Colish <dan@unencrypted.org>, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>, pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
Date: 2009-11-13T12:14:37Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
2009/11/13 Hans-Jürgen Schönig <hs@cybertec.at>: > > On Nov 13, 2009, at 8:06 AM, Michael Meskes wrote: > >> On Thu, Nov 12, 2009 at 03:07:27PM -0500, Robert Haas wrote: >>>> >>>> If you want to submit patches in a series like this one, they need to be >>>> considered standalone, I think. The Linux kernel devs work differently >>>> than us here. >>> >>> Zoltan broke them up because Michael asked him to do so. >> >> Actually these patchsets add different features. I see no reason why they >> should be done as one patch. However, I haven't had the time to look into >> the >> latest ones, but at least that was the situation when I asked Zoltan to >> split >> the patch. >> >> Michael >> -- >> Michael Meskes >> Michael at Fam-Meskes dot De, Michael at Meskes dot (De|Com|Net|Org) >> Michael at BorussiaFan dot De, Meskes at (Debian|Postgresql) dot Org >> ICQ: 179140304, AIM/Yahoo/Skype: michaelmeskes, Jabber: meskes@jabber.org >> VfL Borussia! Forca Barca! Go SF 49ers! Use: Debian GNU/Linux, PostgreSQL >> > > > > good morning, > > are there some pending technical issues with those patches or can we > basically review and commit? *scratches head* How is anyone supposed to answer that question? It is in the process of reviewing them that one decides whether there are any technical issues... ...Robert