Horton

Re: [HACKERS] Replication to Postgres 10 on Windows is broken

Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>

View thread View on postgr.es
From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
To: Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>
Cc: pgsql-bugs@postgresql.org, Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentraut@2ndquadrant.com>, Noah Misch <noah@leadboat.com>, "Augustine, Jobin" <jobin.augustine@openscg.com>, pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
Date: 2017-08-15T15:24:23Z
Lists: pgsql-bugs, pgsql-hackers 
Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> writes:
> I don't see any relevant uses of sockets in older branches, did I miss something?

No, I think we don't need to go back further than v10.  Even if it turns
out we do, I'd just as soon let this get a bit of field testing first.

			regards, tom lane

Commits

  1. Distinguish wait-for-connection from wait-for-write-ready on Windows.

  2. Use asynchronous connect API in libpqwalreceiver