Re: [HACKERS] More detail on settings for pgavd?
Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
To: Chester Kustarz <chester@arbor.net>
Cc: Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com>, pgsql-performance@postgresql.org, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Date: 2003-11-20T19:20:24Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers, pgsql-performance
Chester Kustarz <chester@arbor.net> writes: > i have some tables which are insert only. i do not want to vacuum them > because there are never any dead tuples in them and the vacuum grows the > indexes. Those claims cannot both be true. In any case, plain vacuum cannot grow the indexes --- only a VACUUM FULL that moves a significant number of rows could cause index growth. > vacuum is to reclaim dead tuples. this means it depends on update and > delete. analyze depends on data values/distribution. this means it depends on > insert, update, and delete. thus the dependencies are slightly different > between the 2 operations, an so you can come up with use-cases that > justify running either more frequently. Agreed. regards, tom lane