Re: [OFF-TOPIC] - Known maximum size of the
Don Vaillancourt <donv@webimpact.com>
From: Don Vaillancourt <donv@webimpact.com>
To: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
Date: 2004-05-06T13:47:08Z
Lists: pgsql-performance
Here's a question a little off-topic. What would a 32TB database hardware configuration look like. I'm assuming 200GB hard-drives which would total 160 of them. Double that if you mirror them. Am I correct? At 04:13 AM 06/05/2004, you wrote: >Christopher Kings-Lynne wrote: >>>>What's the case of bigger database PostgreSQL (so greate and amount of >>>>registers) that they know??? >> >>Didn't someone say that RedSheriff had a 10TB postgres database or something? > > From http://www.redsheriff.com/us/news/news_4_201.html > >"According to the company, RedSheriff processes 10 billion records a month >and the total amount of data managed is more than 32TB. Griffin said >PostgreSQL has been in production for 12 months with not a single database >fault in that time "The stability of the database can not be questioned. >Needless to say, we are extremely happy." > >I think it's safe to assume this is not on a spare Dell 600SC though. > >-- > Richard Huxton > Archonet Ltd > >---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- >TIP 7: don't forget to increase your free space map settings Don Vaillancourt Director of Software Development WEB IMPACT INC. 416-815-2000 ext. 245 email: donv@webimpact.com web: http://www.webimpact.com This email message is intended only for the addressee(s) and contains information that may be confidential and/or copyright. If you are not the intended recipient please notify the sender by reply email and immediately delete this email. Use, disclosure or reproduction of this email by anyone other than the intended recipient(s) is strictly prohibited. No representation is made that this email or any attachments are free of viruses. Virus scanning is recommended and is the responsibility of the recipient.