Re: PostgreSQL 12: Feature Highlights
Diego <mrstephenamell@gmail.com>
From: Stephen Amell <mrstephenamell@gmail.com>
To: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com>,
Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>
Cc: Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8@lab.ntt.co.jp>,
David Rowley <david.rowley@2ndquadrant.com>,
"Jonathan S. Katz" <jkatz@postgresql.org>,
pgsql-advocacy@lists.postgresql.org
Date: 2019-05-16T19:18:42Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On 2019-05-16 16:08, Alvaro Herrera wrote: > On 2019-May-16, Bruce Momjian wrote: > >> I think the more specific we make the partition description, the more >> limited it will appear to be. I think almost all partition operations >> will appear to be faster with PG 12, even if users can't articulate >> exactly why. > I don't understand why you want to make things such black boxes. It is > what it is, and some users (not all) will want to understand. People > who have already tested pg11 and found it insufficient may give pg12 a > second look if we tell them we have fixed the deficiencies they found. yep, I agree with Alvaro, I'm one of these users...
Commits
-
doc: PG 12 relnotes, add mention of single-child optimization
- b9a0724cf7a3 12.0 landed
-
docs: split out sort-skip partition item in PG 12 release notes
- 05685897f07e 12.0 landed
-
docs: update partition item in PG 12 release notes
- 356c83795aaa 12.0 landed