Horton

Re: Poll: are people okay with function/operator table redesign?

Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentraut@2ndquadrant.com>

View thread View on postgr.es
From: Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentraut@2ndquadrant.com>
To: Pierre Giraud <pierre.giraud@dalibo.com>, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
Cc: Steven Pousty <steve.pousty@gmail.com>, Pavel Stehule <pavel.stehule@gmail.com>, Isaac Morland <isaac.morland@gmail.com>, PostgreSQL Developers <pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org>
Date: 2020-04-19T10:36:17Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers 
On 2020-04-16 08:26, Pierre Giraud wrote:
> The screenshot attached uses a <dl> tag for the descrition/example block.

I like this better, but then you don't really need the table because you 
can just make the whole thing a definition list.

-- 
Peter Eisentraut              http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services

Commits

  1. Doc: re-re-revise markup for tables of functions.

  2. Doc: revise formatting of function/operator tables.